Decolonizing the Qur’ānic Other

Al-Sāmirī and the Epistemic Authority of Classical Qur’ānic Exegesis

Authors

  • Abdul Ghofur Lecturer, STAI Al-Anwar Sarang Rembang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia.
  • Mohammad Muafi Himam Lecturer, STAI Al-Anwar Sarang Rembang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52541/isiri.v65i2.7365

Keywords:

Decolonial Qur’anic hermeneutics, al-Sāmirī, intertextuality, identity and narrative politics

Abstract

This article examines the figure of al-Sāmirī in the Qur’ānic narrative of the Golden Calf by foregrounding the epistemic authority of classical tafsīr. In verses 20:85–97, the Qur’ān exonerates Prophet Aaron and identifies al-Sāmirī as the agent of deviation. This narrative shift has often been read in Western scholarship through the category of the “Samaritan error”. This article challenges that reading by arguing that the Sāmirī narrative operates within the Qur’ān’s own theological logic, especially its concern with prophetic infallibility and moral accountability. Through an examination of classical exegetical traditions, the article shows that the diversity of explanations regarding al-Sāmirī’s origins reflects hermeneutical flexibility. Classical tafsīr, therefore, should be approached as a tradition of knowledge with its own epistemic autonomy, not merely as historical material for confirming Western literary genealogies. While the name al-Sāmirī bears intertextual resonances with Israelite memory, Jewish-Samaritan polemic, and Late Antique religious debates, classical Muslim interpreters did not systematically turn this figure into a political weapon against living Samaritan communities. Ultimately, al-Sāmirī emerges as a theological figure through whom classical tafsīr negotiates prophetic authority, moral boundaries, and the legitimacy of Qur’ānic interpretation within Islamic intellectual history.

References

Albayrak, Ismail. “The Qur’anic Narratives of the Golden Calf Episode.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 3, no. 1 (April 2001): 47–69.

al-Razi, Fakhruddin. Tafsir Al-Kabir (Mafatih al-Ghaib). Kairo: Dar el-hadith, 2012.

Al-Ṭhabarī, Abu Ja‟far Muḥammad Ibn Jarīr. Jāmi’u al-Bayān Fī Ta`wīli al-Qur`ān. Beirut: Daarul Kitab, 1992.

Amatullah, Nur Afra Afifah Amani, Nur Laili Nabilah Nazahah Najiyah, and Inayah Rohmaniyah. “Intertextuality and Late Antiquity in Michael E. Pregill’s Interpretation of the Worship of the Golden Calf in Surah Thāhā: 83-97.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 24, no. 1 (January 31, 2023): 1–22.

Atanasova, Kameliya, and Matthew Chalmers. “The Status of Samaritans in Sixteenth-Century Ottoman Damascus.” Journal of Law and Religion 38, no. 3 (September 23, 2023): 436–449.

Berman, L. V. “Abraham Geiger, Judaism and Islam. Prolegomenon by Moshe Perlmann (New York: Ktav, 1970). Pp. 170.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 9, no. 3 (August 29, 1978): 425–425.

Crown, Alan D. “Redating the Schism between the Judaeans and the Samaritans.” The Jewish Quarterly Review 82, no. 1/2 (July 1991): 17.

Darmawan, Budi, and Danil Mahmud Chaniago. “Studi Historiografi Islam Klasik: Kritik Dan Tinjauan Terhadap Karya Al-Mas’udi.” Fajar Historia: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah dan Pendidikan 8, no. 2 (August 31, 2024): 233–249.

Firestone, Reuven. “Muhammad, the Jews, and the Composition of the Qur’an: Sacred History and Counter-History.” Religions 10, no. 1 (January 18, 2019): 63.

Gökkir, Necmettin. “Western Challenges and Muslim Hermeneutical Responses: Post-Colonial Interpretations of the Qur’an in the Middle East,” 2015. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:204856004.

Green, Michael. “A Decolonial Syncretism of Unity.” International Review of Mission 113, no. 1 (May 31, 2024): 202–222.

Hepner, Gershon. “The Samaritan Version of the Tenth Commandment.” Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament 20, no. 1 (May 2006): 147–152.

Hjelm, Ingrid. “What Do Samaritans and Jews Have in Common? Recent Trends in Samaritan Studies.” Currents in Biblical Research 3, no. 1 (October 1, 2004): 9–59.

Lumbard, Joseph. “Decolonizing Qurʾanic Studies.” Religions 13, no. 2 (February 17, 2022): 176.

Nodet, Étienne. The Samaritans. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2023.

Noor, Ahmad Yunus Mohd, and Asmilyia Mohd Mokhtar. “Criticising the Abraham Geiger’s Approach and Criticism of the Qur’an and the Prophet.” Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan 7, no. 1 (June 30, 2023): 12.

Oefner, Peter J., Georg Hölzl, Peidong Shen, Isaac Shpirer, Dov Gefel, Tal Lavi, Eilon Woolf, et al. “Genetics and the History of the Samaritans: Y-Chromosomal Microsatellites and Genetic Affinity between Samaritans and Cohanim.” Human Biology 85, no. 6 (December 2013): 825–857.

Pregill, Michael E. The Golden Calf between Bible and Qur’an. Oxford University PressOxford, 2020.

———. “The Qur’anic Calf Episode Between Orientalism and Islamic Tradition.” In The Golden Calf between Bible and Qur’an, 265–317. Oxford University PressOxford, 2020.

Qurtubi, (al)Ahmad Muhammad bin. Al-Jāmi’ Li Ahkām Al-Qur’an. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risālah, 2006.

Rubin, Uri. The Eye of the Beholder: The Life of Muhammad as Viewed by the Early Muslims. Gerlach Press, 2024.

Saleh, Walid A. “A Fifteenth-Century Muslim Hebraist: Al-Biqāʿī and His Defense of Using the Bible to Interpret the Qurʾān.” Speculum 83, no. 3 (2008): 629–654. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038713400014615.

Wood, Philip. “The Samaritans as an Islamicate Minority, c. 750–950.” Journal of Religious Minorities under Muslim Rule 2, no. 1 (September 25, 2024): 1–27.

Yarbrough, Luke. “Medieval Sunni Historians on Fatimid Policy and Non-Muslim Influence.” Journal of Medieval History 45, no. 3 (May 27, 2019): 331–346.

Yasin, MERAL. “Senin Derdin Neydi Ey Sāmirī?” (20/Ṭā-Hā:95).” Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 58, no. 2 (2017): 183–192.

Zucker, David J. “Idolizing Aaron: Aaron Defended or Disparaged?” Biblical Theology Bulletin: Journal of Bible and Culture 54, no. 2 (May 8, 2024): 89–100.

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Ghofur, Abdul, and Mohammad Muafi Himam. 2026. “Decolonizing the Qur’ānic Other: Al-Sāmirī and the Epistemic Authority of Classical Qur’ānic Exegesis”. Islamic Studies 65 (2). https://doi.org/10.52541/isiri.v65i2.7365.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.