Customary Law, Islamic Law, and Colonial Authority

Three Contrasting Case Studies and their aftermath

Authors

  • William R. Roff Honorary fellow, Emeritus Professor of History, Columbia University, Professional Research Associate, School of Oriental and African Studies, London, UK.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52541/isiri.v49i4.3670

Keywords:

Customary Law, Islamic Law, colonial authority, Case Studies

Abstract

The essay describes and analyzes the ways in which in the early decades of the twentieth century three distinct colonial regimes, Dutch, French and British, in three widely separated territories with majority Muslim populations — the Netherlands East Indies, Algeria and India — alike utilised existing juridical and social tensions between customary law (variously, ‘adah, ‘urf) and Islamic law (Shari‘ah) to consolidate their rule. Though still too little examined comparatively, the legal processes and structures thus established have had profound effects on law and its practice in the successor nation states, Indonesia, Algeria and Pakistan.

References

N/A

Published

2010-11-01

How to Cite

Roff, William R. 2010. “Customary Law, Islamic Law, and Colonial Authority: Three Contrasting Case Studies and Their Aftermath”. Islamic Studies 49 (4):455–462. https://doi.org/10.52541/isiri.v49i4.3670.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.