A Probable Reason for Qur’ānic Prohibition of Ribā

Dissimilarity of Price and Interest Rate as Equilibrating Variables

  • Muhammad Mazhar Iqbal Professor of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, SZABIST-Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Anwar Shah Professor, School of Economics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Keywords: interest, ribā, loan market, goods market.

Abstract

The Qur’ān bans interest (ribā) and declares its dissimilarity with price in commodity trading. This paper provides a numerical explanation for this dissimilarity. It argues that calculating accrued interest for any loan requires information about the interest rate and compounding period. The compounding period is generally not stated explicitly; rather, it is inferred from the repayment schedule of a loan and bond. For a given principal and interest rate, the interest amount changes in response to any change in the compounding period. Alternatively, for any timeline to repay a prescribed amount of loan more than once a year, three different rates are defined. These are nominal interest rate, internal rate of return, and annual percentage rate. Since various participants in the loanable funds market concentrate on different rates and the ranking of alternative loan options concerning these rates may be contradictory, the law of one interest rate with respect to any one of these three rates is highly implausible if not impossible to prevail in the loanable funds market.

References

Armantier, Olivier, Eric Ghysels, Asani Sarkar, and Jeffrey Shrader (2015) “Discount Window Stigma during the 2007–2008 Financial Crisis,” Journal of Financial Economics, 118:2, 317–35.
Blinder A. S. (1987). Credit Rationing and Effective Supply Failures. Economic Journal, 97(1), 327-52.
Bradley, Teresa and Paul Patton (2002) Essential Mathematics for Business adnd Economics 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Brealey, Richard A., Stewart C. Myers & Alan J. Marcus (2010) Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, McGraw-Hill: New York.
Campolieti, Giuseppe and Roman N. Makarow (2014) Financial Mathematics; A Comprehensive Treatment, CRS Press: New York.
Ennis, Huberto M. and David A. Price (2020) Understanding Discount Window Stigma Policy Brief 1820-04, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
Ennis, Huberto M. and Ranee Haltom (2010) Is There Stigma Associated with Discount Window Borrowing? Economic Brief 10-05, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
Goldberg, P. K. and Verboven, F. (2005) Market Integration and Convergence to the Law of One Price: Evidence from the European Car Market. Journal of International Economics, 65, 49-79.
Hopper, Laura (2019) What are Open Market Operations? Monetary Policy Tools, Explained Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Hunter, W. C. (1993). Discrimination in Mortgage Lending. Chicago Fed Letter July.
Meulendyke, Ann-Marie (1998) U.S. Monetary Policy and Financial Markets Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Mishkin, Frederuc S. (2019) The Economics of Money, Banking and Financial Markets 12th ed. Pearson, New Delhi.
Mishkin, Frederuc S. and Stanley G. Eakins (2009) Financial Markets and Institutions 6th ed. Pearson, New Delhi.
Pippenger, J. (2016) Arbitrage and the Law of One Price: Setting the Record Straight. Theoretical Economics Letters 6, 1017-33.
Pippenger, J. and Phillips, L. (2008) The Law of One Price: An Interpretation of the Literature and Some New Evidence. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 8, 71-84.
Published
2024-06-30
How to Cite
Iqbal, M. M., & Shah, A. (2024). A Probable Reason for Qur’ānic Prohibition of Ribā: Dissimilarity of Price and Interest Rate as Equilibrating Variables. Islamic Studies, 63(2). https://doi.org/10.52541/isiri.v63i2.2847