Development of Women’s Right to No-fault Judicial Divorce (Khul‘) in Pakistan
Judges and ‘Ulamā’ as Catalysts for Legal Reform
Abstract
Pakistan is the first Muslim country, which recognized women’s unilateral right to no-fault judicial divorce (khul‘) under Islamic family law in 1959. In contemporary Pakistan, Muslim women have the unilateral right to dissolve their marriages through summary court procedure. This has been made possible because of the gradual changes in case law and procedural law stretching over more than half a century. Despite questioning the validity of state-enforced Islamic divorce law on the basis that it is not in line with classical Islamic law (sharī‘ah/fiqh), traditional ‘ulamā’ (religious scholars) accept the validity of court decrees of the dissolution of marriage based on khul‘. As a result, the validity of judicial khul‘ under Islamic law is well established in Pakistan. This shows that the judges of the superior courts act as final arbiters by determining the binding interpretation of the Qur’ān and sunnah and the same has been approved by the ‘ulamā’.
References
Aali v. Additional District Judge Quetta 1986 CLC 27 (Quetta).
Abdul Aziz v. Mst. Malika and another 1997 SCMR 1599.
Abdul Ghafoor v. Judge Family Court 1999 SCMR 2631.
Abdul Khaliq v. Judge Family Court 2003 MLD 1120 (Lah).
Abdul Riaz v. Hamidan Begum 1994 SCMR 2019.
Ahmed, Nausheen. “Family Law in Pakistan: Using the Secular to Influence the Religious.” In Adjudicating Family Law in Muslim Courts, edited by Elisa Giunchi, 85-105. New York: Routledge, 2014.
Al-Azhari, Muhammad Karam Shah. Żiyā’ al-Qur’ān. Lahore: Zia ul-Qur’an Publications, 1981.
Al-Ghazālī, Muḥammad. Ḥuqūq al-Insān bayn Ta‘ālīm al-Islām wa ‘Ilān al-Umam al-Muttaḥidah, 4th ed. Cairo: Nahḍat Miṣr, 2005.
Ali, Kecia. Marriage and Slavery in Early Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.
Ali, Shaheen Sardar, and Rukhshanda Naz. “Marriage, Dower, and Divorce: Superior Courts and Case Law in Pakistan.” In Shaping Women’s Lives: Laws, Practices & Strategies in Pakistan, edited by Farida Shaheed et al. Lahore: Shirkat Gah, 1998.
Al-Ṣābūnī, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān. Madā Ḥurriyat al-Zawjayn fī ’l-Ṭalāq. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, n.d.
Al-Ṣan‘ānī, Muḥammad b. Ismā‘īl. Subul al-Salām. Cairo: Maktabat Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī, 1960.
Al-Zībārī, ‘Āmir Sa‘īd. Aḥkām al-Khul‘ fī ’l-Sharī‘ah al-Islāmiyyah. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 1997.
Amanullah v. District Judge Gujranwala 1996 SCMR 411.
Anderson, J. N. D. “Reforms in the Law of Divorce in the Muslim World.” Studia Islamica 31 (1970): 41-52.
Aurangzeb v. Mst. Gulzan PLD 2006 Kar 563.
Balqis Fatima v. Najm-ul-Ikram Qureshi PLD 1959 Lah 566.
Carroll, Lucy. “Qur’an 2:229: ‘A Charter Granted to the Wife?’ Judicial Khul‘ in Pakistan.” Islamic Law and Society 3 (1996): 91-126.
Council of Islamic Ideology, Session No. 199, May 27-28, 2015. http://cii.gov.pk /announcements/Dissolution.pdf.
Dilshad v. Mst. Nusrat Nasir and another PLD 1991 SC 779.
Dr. Fakhr-ud-Din v. Mst. Kausar Takreem PLD 2009 Pesh 92.
Esposito, John L. “Perspectives on Islamic Law Reform: The Case of Pakistan.” NYU Journal of International Law & Politics 13 (1980): 217-48.
Fatwā issued by al-Jāmi‘ah al-Banūriyyah al-‘Ālamiyyah, Karachi, dated November 6, 2010.
Fatwā issued by Ghulām Ḥusain of Jāmi‘ah Dār al-‘Ulūm Ḥaqqāniyyah, Akhora Khattak, Nowshera, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, dated September 14, 2014.
Fatwā issued by Jāmi‘ah Na‘īmiyyah, Lahore, dated December 15, 2016.
Fatwā issued by Jāmi‘at al-‘Ulūm al-Islāmiyyah, Banuri Town, Karachi, dated December 28, 2016.
Fatwā issued by Jāmi‘at al-Rashīd, Karachi, dated January 9, 2017.
Fatwā issued by Malik Muḥammad Bāqir Ghallō of Ḥauzah-i ‘Ilmiyyah, Jāmi‘at al-Muntaẓar, Lahore.
Fatwā issued by Markaz al-Da‘wah al-Salafiyyah, Satiana, Faisalabad, dated December 21, 2015.
Ghazala Yasmin v. Additional District Judge Rawalpindi 1992 MLD 2289 (Lah).
Haider, Nadya. “Islamic Legal Reform: The Case of Pakistan and Family Law.” Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 12 (2000): 287-341.
Hinchcliffe, Doreen. “Divorce in Pakistan: Judicial Reform.” Journal of Islamic and Comparative Law 2 (1968): 3-25.
Hussain, Mubasher. “Khāvind kī Rażāmandī kē baghair Tanfīdh-i Khul‘ aur Ahl-i Ḥadīth Nuqṭah-i Naẓar: Aik Tajziyatī Muṭāla‘ah.” Fikr-o Naẓar 53, no. 2 (2015): 79-101.
Khān, Aḥmad Rażā. Fatāvā-i Riżviyyah. Lahore: Raza Foundation, 1998.
Khurshid Ali v. Mumtaz Begum 1980 CLC 1212 (Lah).
Khurshid Bibi v. Baboo Muhammad Amin PLD 1967 SC 97.
Khurshid Bibi v. Dildar 1983 CLC 3309 (Lah).
Malik Ghulam Nabi v. Mst. Pirzada Jamila PLD 2004 SC 129.
Manzooran Bibi v. Khan Muhammad 1998 CLC 1929 (Lah).
Maudūdī, Sayyid Abū ’l-A‘lā. Ḥuqūq al-Zawjayn. Lahore: Idārah-i Tarjumān al-Qur’ān, 2013 [1943]).
Monshee Buzl-ul-Ruheem v. Shumsoonnissa Begum (Calcutta) [1867] 8 MIA 379; UKPC 19.
Mst. Balqis Bano v. Shamim Ahmad 1991 CLC 2057 (Lah).
Mst. Ghulam Zohra v. Faiz Rasool and others 1988 MLD 1353 (Lah).
Mst. Hafeezan Bibi v. District Judge Narowal 1995 MLD 136 (Lah).
Mst. Huma Hafeez v. Shaukat Javaid 1993 CLC 855 (Lah).
Mst. Kalsoom v. Muhammad Aslam 1983 CLC 2056 (Lah).
Mst. Khurshid Mai v. The Additional District Judge Multan 1994 MLD 1255 (Lah).
Mst. Naseem Akhtar v. Muhammad Rafique PLD 2005 SC 293.
Mst. Nasim Akhtar v. Muhammad Athar Siddiqui 1989 MLD 119 (Lah).
Mst. Nasim Kishwar v. Muhammad Nawaz 1988 MLD 1306 (Lah), 1307.
Mst. Nazir v. Additional Judge Rahimyar Khan 1995 CLC 296 (Lah).
Mst. Nazli Mustahsan v. Additional District Judge Rawalpindi 2002 YLR 2604 (Lah).
Mst. Rashidan Bibi v. Bashir Ahmad PLD 1983 Lah 549, 550.
Mst. Rasoolan Bibi v. Additional District Judge Lahore PLD 1997 Lah 229.
Mst. Rehana Tabbasam v. Amanullah 1994 MLD 1807 (Lah).
Mst. Rozeena Shaheen v. Abdur Rehman 2013 YLR 842.
Mst. Safia Bibi v. Muzalim Hussain 2001 YLR 3025 (Lah).
Mst. Saiqa v. The Judge Family Court Lahore 1994 MLD 2204 (Lah).
Mst. Shah Begum v. District Judge Sialkot PLD 1995 Lah 19.
Mst. Zarina v. Additional District Judge Jhang 1993 MLD 1507 (Lah).
Muhammad Abbasi v. Saima Abbasi 1992 CLC 937 (Lah).
Muhammad Afzal v. Additional District Judge Attok 2010 CLC 369 (Lah).
Muhammad Akram v. Mst. Shakeela Bibi 2003 CLC 1787 (Lah).
Muhammad Arif v. Saima Noreen 2015 SCMR 804.
Muhammad Bilal v. Nasim Akhtar 1983 CLC 2390 (Lah).
Muhammad Imran Anwar Khan v. Government of Punjab Petition No. 4/I/2016.
Muhammad Iqbal Kocub v. Judge Family Court Lahore 1993 CLC 699 (Lah), 701.
Muhammad Ismail v. Judge Family Court Rahim Yar Khan 2009 YLR 1700 (Lah).
Muhammad Kaleem Asif v. Additional District Judge PLD 2009 Lah 484.
Muhammad Rafiq v. Kaneez Fatima 2000 SCMR 1563.
Muhammad Rafiq v. Surraya Bibi 1990 ALD 549.
Muhammad Siddiq v. Kalsoom Bibi 1984 SCMR 523.
Muhammad Yaqoob v. Mst. Shagufta Begum 1981 CLC 143; 1981 CLC 1968.
Mukhtar Ahmad v. Ansa Naheed PLD 2002 SC 273.
Muneeb ur Rahman, Mufti. “Khul‘ aur Faskh-i Nikāḥ.” Daily Dunya, June 13, 2015. http://dunya.com.pk/index.php/author/mufti-muneeb-ul-rehman/2015-06-13/11611/56288277#.Wca749MjFE4.
Munir, Muhammad. “Challenging State Authority or Running a Parallel Judicial System? ‘Ulama versus the Judiciary in Pakistan.” LUMS Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2017): 1-28.
Munir, Muhammad. “One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The Unending Twist and Turn Regarding the Law of Khul‘ and Its Exposition by the Superior Courts in Pakistan.” Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice 17, no. 3 (2021): 133-49.
Munir, Muhammad. “The Law of Khul‘ in Islamic Law and the Legal System of Pakistan.” LUMS Law Journal 2 (2015): 33-62.
Nasir v. Mst. Rubina 2012 MLD 1576.
Province of Punjab v. Zahoor Elahi 1989 SCMR 173.
Raḥmānī, Khālid Saif Allāh. Jadīd Fiqhī Masā’il. Karachi: Zamzam Publishers, 2010.
Raisa Begum v. Muhammad Hussain 1986 MLD 1418 (Kar).
Safia Begum v. Khadim Hussain 1985 CLC 1869 (Lah).
Said Muhammad v. Judge, Faisil Court 1985 CLC 2509 (Lah).
Saleem Ahmad v. Government of Pakistan PLD 2014 FSC 43.
Saleem Jehangir v. Khatm-un-Nisa 1997 SCMR 1601.
Section 10 (4) of the Family Courts Act 1964 under the Ordinance LV of 2002.
Section 2 (ix), the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act (VIII of) 1939.
Shabbiran Bibi v. Faqir Muhammad 1994 MLD Lahore 1550.
Shahid Javed v. Sabba Jabben 1991 CLC 805.
Shakila Bibi v. Muhammad Farooq 1994 CLC 230 (Lah).
Shamas Ali v. Additional District Judge Sambrial PLD 2012 Lah 183.
Siddiq v. Mst. Sharfan PLD 1968 Lah 411.
Subhan Khatoon v. Nazar Muhammad PLD 1981 Kar 474.
Sughran Begum v. Additional District Judge 1992 CLC 1733 (Lah).
Sughran Bibi v. Additional District Judge 1992 CLC 1733 (Lah).
Tabassum Khurshid v. Sardar Abid Iqbal 2008 CLC 1337 (Lah).
The State v. Muhammad Sheer PLD 1964 Lah 96.
Usmani, Mufti Muhammad Taqi. “Islām maiṇ Khul‘ kī Ḥaqīqat.” In Fiqhī Maqālāt. Karachi: Maiman Publishers, 1996.
Usmani, Mufti Muhammad Taqi. Fatāvā-i ‘Uthmānī. Karachi: Maktabah-i Ma‘ārif al-Qur’ān, 2006.
Usmani, Mufti Muhammad Taqi. Islām maiṇ Khul‘ kī Ḥaqīqat. Karachi: Maiman Islamic Publishers, n.d.
Yefet, Karin C. “The Constitution and Female-Initiated Divorce in Pakistan: Western Liberalism in Islamic Garb.” Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 34 (2011): 553-615.
Yilmaz, Ihsan. “Pakistan Federal Shariat Court’s Collective Ijtihād on Gender Equality, Women’s Rights and the Right to Family Life.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 25 (2014): 181-92.
Yūsuf, Ḥafiẓ Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn. “‘Aurat kō Ṭalāq kā Ḥaqq Tafvīż karnā Sharī‘at maiṇ Tabdīlī hē.” Muḥaddith 45, no. 4 (2013). http://magazine.mohaddis.com/shumara/244-sep-2013/2679-aurat-talaq-haq-tafweez-shareiyat-tabdeeli.
Zāhid, Maulānā Muḥammad. “‘Adālatī Tansīkh-i Nikāḥ kā Shar‘ī Ḥukm.” Fikr-o Naẓar 39, no. 3 (2002): 3-50.
Zainab Bibi v. Shaukat Ali 1993 CLC 48 (Lah).
Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. The Ulama in Contemporary Islam: Custodians of Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press 2002.
Publication of material in the journal means that the author assigns copyright to Islamic Studies including the rights to electronic publishing. This is, inter alia, to ensure the efficient handling of requests from third parties to reproduce articles as well as to enable wide dissemination of the published material. Authors may, however, use their material in other publications acknowledging Islamic Studies as the original place of publication. Requests by third parties for permission to reprint should be addressed to the Editor, Islamic Studies.
.jpg)
