The Irreconcilable Conflict between Islam and Liberalism
Abstract
John Rawls used an apparently neutral apparatus to derive the principles of justice that all “rational” people ought to agree with because they provide the basis of coexistence in a pluralistic society. He believes that religious faith is consistent with the commitment to liberalism. The paper shows that the Rawlsian liberal “self” modelled in the original position is not consistent with the original position recognized by religion in general and Islam in particular. According to Islam, the human self is mukallaf (subject of God) while Rawls treats it non-mukallaf. This is so because Rawlsian original position presumes an atheist self behind the veil of ignorance. This conceptualization of self is not only inconsistent with but also hostile to religion. The claims about liberalism’s tolerance towards religion are superficial. The liberal self can express itself in various religious forms provided these are aligned with the system of rights acknowledged by the liberal atheist self.
References
Bailey, Tom, and Valentina Gentile, eds. Rawls and Religion. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.
Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Liberty Reader, edited by David Miller, 33–57. London: Routledge, 2017.
Bielefeldt, Heiner. “Western” versus “Islamic” Human Rights conceptions? A Critique of Cultural Essentialism in the Discussion on Human Rights.” Political Theory 28, no. 1 (2000): 90–121.
Binder, Leonard. Islamic Liberalism: A Critique of Development Ideologies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
Chung, Hun. “The Impossibility of Liberal Rights in a Diverse World.” Economics & Philosophy 35, no. 1 (2019): 1–27.
Desch, Michael C. “America’s Liberal Illiberalism: The Ideological Origins of Overreaction in US Foreign Policy.” International Security 32, no. 3 (2007): 7–43.
Devellennes, Charles. “Atheism, Secularism and Toleration: Towards a Political Atheology.” Contemporary Political Theory 16, no. 2 (2017): 228–47.
Dossa, Shiraz. “Liberal Imperialism? Natives, Muslims, and Others.” Political Theory 30, no. 5 (2002): 738–45.
Dworkin, Ronald. “Liberalism.” In Liberalism and Its Critics, edited by Michael J. Sandel. New York: New York University Press, 1984.
Abou El Fadl, Khaled. “Islam and the Challenge of Democracy.” In Islam and the Challenge of Democracy, edited by Joshua Cohen and Deborah Chasman, 3–46. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.
Fazlur Rahman. Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
Gartzke, Erik. “The Capitalist Peace.” American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 1 (2007): 166–91.
Horton, John. “Rawls, Public Reason and the Limits of Liberal Justification.” Contemporary Political Theory 2, no. 1 (2003): 5–23.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth, 2007 [1981].
Maudoodi, Abul A’la. Islamic Civilization: Its Foundational Beliefs and Principles. Translated by Syed Akif. Leicestershire: Islamic Foundation, 2013 [1966].
Mehta, Uday Singh. Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2018.
Muldoon, Ryan, Chiara Lisciandra, Mark Colyvan, Carlo Martini, Giacomo Sillari, and Jan Sprenger. “Disagreement behind the Veil of Ignorance.” Philosophical Studies 170, no. 3 (2014): 377–94.
Mulhall, Stephen, and Adam Swift, Liberals and Communitarians. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
An-Na’im, Abdullahi A. “Islam and Human Rights: Beyond the Universality Debate.” Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 94 (2000): 95–101.
Nasr, Seyyed H. Ideals and Realities of Islam, 2nd ed. London: Allen and Unwin, 1977.
Pitts, Jennifer. A Turn of Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in France and Britain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
Qutb, Sayyid. “Basic Principles of the Islamic Worldview. Translated by Rami David. n.p.: Islamic Publications, 2006.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.
Rawls. Political Liberalism, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
Sandel, Michael. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Al-Sarakhsī, Abū Bakr Muḥammad. Uṣūl al-Sarakhsī. Edited by Abū ’l-Wafā al-Afghānī. Cairo: n.p., 1950.
Shepard, William E. “Muhammad Sa‘id al-‘Ashmawi and the Application of the Shari‘a in Egypt.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 28, no. 1 (1996): 39–58.
Sikka, Sonia. “Liberalism, Multiculturalism, and the Case for Public Religion.” Politics and Religion 3, no. 3 (2010): 580–609.
Suri, Abdul Wahab. “The Liberal Metamorphosis within a Human Rights Framework: The Future of the Nation State.” Market Forces 6, no. 1 (2010): 47–63.
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, CA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. “Libertarian Paternalism.” American Economic Review 93, no. 2 (2003): 175–79.
Wenar, Leif, and Branko Milanovic. “Are Liberal Peoples Peaceful?” Journal of Political Philosophy 17, no. 4 (2009): 462–86.
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. “Why We Should Reject What Liberalism Tells Us about Speaking and Acting in Public for Religious Reasons.” In Religion and Contemporary Liberalism, edited by Paul J. Weithman, 162–81. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997.
Publication of material in the journal means that the author assigns copyright to Islamic Studies including the rights to electronic publishing. This is, inter alia, to ensure the efficient handling of requests from third parties to reproduce articles as well as to enable wide dissemination of the published material. Authors may, however, use their material in other publications acknowledging Islamic Studies as the original place of publication. Requests by third parties for permission to reprint should be addressed to the Editor, Islamic Studies.
.jpg)
