The Diachronic Change of the Practice of Iftā’
From Individual to Collective
Abstract
The connection between Islamic legal methodologies and practice in the development of Islamic law has been made by the practice of iftā’. Governmental and non-governmental religious institutions, along with individual Muslim scholars, emerged as the sources of legal authority. Although the origin of the practice of iftā’ can be traced back to the time of the Prophet Muḥammad (peace be on him), its nature has changed from individual to collective in the modern age. The contemporary Muslim world has witnessed a rapid proliferation of modern religious institutions of fatwās, which significantly contributed to the dynamism of Islamic law and the regulation of local and regional practices. The practice of iftā’ can be described as a legal formulation produced during the consultation process between a lay Muslim and a Muslim scholar. The product of iftā’ is known as fatwā, which is an Islamic legal opinion that Muslim scholars issue to clarify a legal problem that Muslims face. Since the twentieth century, the practice of iftā’ has begun to be assumed by modern religious institutions. This institutionalization process resulted in the practice of collective iftā’. Contrary to scholars who allege the immutability of Islamic legal methodologies, this change can be interpreted as demonstrating the progressive dimension of Islamic law within the area of legal theories and methodologies. The paper seeks to examine the diachronic transformation of fatwā and explores the driving factors behind the instrumentalization of collective fatwā. After giving a detailed terminological definition of fatwā, the research introduces the differences between fatwā (Islamic legal opinion) and ḥukm (court verdict) to forestall any terminological complexity. The diachronic process is then addressed by referring to key turning points that evidence the transformation of the practice of iftā’ from individual to collective. In the last instance, public, state, and collective fatwās are engaged to adduce the diversification within the end-products of the practice of iftā’.
References
Agrama, Hussein Ali. “Ethics, Tradition, Authority: Toward an Anthropology of the Fatwa.” American Ethnologist 37, no. 1 (2010): 2-18. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01238.x/epdf.
Al-Atawneh, Muhammad. Wahhābī Islam Facing the Challenges of Modernity: Dār al-Iftā in the Modern Saudi State. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
Ayar, Talip. Osmanlı Devletinde Fetvâ Eminliği (1892-1922). Ankara: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı Yayınları, 2014.
Badawi, Elsaid M., and Muhammed Abdel Haleem, Arabic-English Dictionary of Qur’anic Usage. Boston: Brill, 2008.
Caerio, Alexandre V. “Fatwas for European Muslims: The Minority Fiqh Project and the Integration of Islam in Europe.” PhD diss., Universiteit Utrecht, 2011.
Caeiro, Alexandre. “Transnational Ulama, European Fatwas, and Islamic Authority: A Case Study of the European Council for Fatwa and Research.” In Producing Islamic Knowledge: Transmission and Dissemination in Western Europe, ed. Martin van Bruinessen and Stefano Allievi. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.
DeLorenzo, Yusuf Talal. “The Fiqh Councilor of North America.” In Muslims on the Americanization Path? edited by Yvonne Y. Haddad and John L. Esposito. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Elgawhary, Tarek. Rewriting Islamic Law: The Opinions of the Ulamā towards Codification of Personal Status Law in Egypt. New Jersey: Gorgias Press LLC, 2019.
Faruqi, Danish. “The Spiritual Reformist Thought of the Amir ‘Abd al-Qādir al-Jazā’irī’ in the Eyes of His Western Interpreters: A Critical Historiographical Review.” Master’s thesis, Washington University, 2012.
Hallaq, Wael B. “From Fatwās to Furū‘: Growth and Change in Islamic Substantive Law.” Islamic Law and Society 1, no. 1 (1994): 29-65.
Ibrahim, Badruddin, Mahmad Arifin, and Siti Zainab Abd Rashid. “The Role of Fatwa and Mufti in Contemporary Muslim Society.” Pertanika Social Sciences & Humanities 23 (2015): 315-25.
Islamic Fiqh Academy (Jeddah), Resolutions and Recommendations of the Council of the Islamic Fiqh Academy 1985-2000. Jeddah: Islamic Development Bank, 2000. https://uaelaws.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/resolutions-and-recommendations-of-the-council-of-the-islamic-fiqh-academy.pdf.
Kaptein, Nico J. G. “The Voice of the ‘Ulamâ’: Fatwas and Religious Authority.” Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions 49, no. 125 (2004): 115-30.
Lefѐvre, Raphaёl. “Lebanon’s Dar al-Fatwa and Search for Moderation.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. January 5, 2015. http://carnegieendowment.org/sada/?fa=57627.
Masud, Muhammad Khalid. “The Significance of Istiftā’ in the Fatwā Discourse.” Islamic Studies 48, no. 3 (2009): 341-66.
Masud, Muhammad Khalid, Brinkley Morris Messick, and David Stephan Powers, Islamic Legal Interpretation: Muftis and Their Fatwas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Masud, Muhammad Khalid, et al. “Fatwā.” In the Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. Oxford Islamic Studies Online. http://www.oxfordislamicstudies .com/print/opr/t236/e0243.
Al-Qaraḍāwī, Yūsuf. Al-Ijtihād al-Mu‘āṣir bayna al-Inḍibāṭ wa ’l-Infirāṭ. Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islāmī, 1998.
Al-Qarāfī, Aḥmad b. Idrīs. Al-Iḥkām fī Tamyīz al-Fatāwā ‘an al-Aḥkām wa Taṣarrufāt al-Qāḍī wa ’l-Imām. Beirut: Maktab al-Maṭbū‘āt al-Islāmiyyah, 1995.
Skovgaard-Petersen, Jakob. “A Typology of Fatwas.” Die Welt Des Islams 55, no. 3-4 (2015): 278-85.
Skovgaard-Petersen, Jakob. Defining Islam for the Egyptian State: Muftis and Fatwas of the Dār al-Iftā. Leiden: Brill, 1997.
Vogel, Frank. Islamic Law and Legal System: Studies of Saudi Arabia. Leiden: Brill, 2000.
Wehr, Hans. A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic. Edited by J. Milton Cowan. 3rd ed. New York: Spoken Language Services, 1976.
Yakar, Emine Enise. “A Critical Comparison between the Presidency of Religious Affairs (Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı) and the Office of Shaykh Al-Islām.” Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 6, no. 11 (2019): 421-52. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/k7auifd/issue/51357/640278.
Yakar, Emine Enise. “The Influential Role of the Practice of Iftā’ in Saudi Politico-Legal Arena.” Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice 16, no. 1 (2020): 35-61.
Yakar, Emine Enise. Islamic Law and Society: The Practice of Iftā’ and Religious Institutions. New York: Routledge, 2021.
Yakar, Emine Enise, and Sümeyra Yakar. The Transformational Process of the Presidency of Religious Affairs in Turkey. Riyadh: King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies, 2017.
Yakar, Sumeyra. “The Usage of Custom in the Contemporary Legal System of Saudi Arabia: Divorce on Trial.” Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 6, no. 11 (2019): 395-419.
Yakar, Sümeyra and Emine Enise Yakar. “A Critical Comparison between the Classical Divorce Types of Ḥanbalī and Ja‘farī Schools.” Darulfunun Ilahiyat 31, no. 2 (2020): 275-98. DOI: 10.26650/di.2020.31.2.803260.
Yavuz, M. Hakan. “Tukey: Islam without Shari’a?” In Shari’a Politics: Islamic Law and Society in the Modern World, edited by Robert W. Hefner. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2011.
Publication of material in the journal means that the author assigns copyright to Islamic Studies including the rights to electronic publishing. This is, inter alia, to ensure the efficient handling of requests from third parties to reproduce articles as well as to enable wide dissemination of the published material. Authors may, however, use their material in other publications acknowledging Islamic Studies as the original place of publication. Requests by third parties for permission to reprint should be addressed to the Editor, Islamic Studies.
.jpg)
