موقف المحدثين من الإمام الشافعي
The Opinions of Hadith Scholars on Imam Al-Shafi'i
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52541/adal.v59i4.3363Keywords:
Hadith, Hadith scholars, Al-Shafi'i, criticism, stance, verification and critique, narrationAbstract
Imam Al-Shafi'i has faced significant criticism from ancient times to the present, particularly concerning various aspects of his scholarly contributions. Among the most prominent critiques are objections regarding his knowledge of Hadith, his status within the discipline, and the stance of Hadith scholars toward him. These critiques originated during his lifetime and have continued to resurface across the centuries. Notable responses to these criticisms were offered by esteemed scholars such as Al-Bayhaqi and Al-Khatib Al-Baghdadi, who authored works addressing these objections and providing valuable insights still relevant today. Critics often highlight specific issues related to Hadith studies, including Yahya ibn Ma'in's critique of Al-Shafi'i and the absence of his narrations in the collections of Al-Bukhari and Muslim. This article aims to respond to these criticisms, contextualize the actions of Hadith scholars, and provide an appropriate historical and scholarly perspective.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
It is a condition of publication in this journal that authors assign copyright or license publication rights of their articles to the Islamic Research Institute, International Islamic University, Islamabad. This enables IRI to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the article, and of course the journal, to the widest possible readership in print and electronic formats as appropriate. Furthermore, the authors are required to secure permission if they want to reproduce any figure, table, or extract from the text of another source. This applies to direct reproduction as well as "derivative reproduction" (where you have created a new figure or table which derives substantially from a copyrighted source).
