رواية الحديث بالمعنى بين الطاعنين والمنكرين -عرض ومناقشة-
Narration of the Ḥadīth non-Verbatim between its Critics and Rejectionist: A Critical Survey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52541/adal.v58i2.1722Keywords:
Sunnah, Narration by meaning, Sunnah Disapproval, Legal DerivationAbstract
This article investigates the contentious issue of Ḥadīth transmission by analyzing two opposing scholarly perspectives on "non-Verbatim”. The first perspective argues that the entirety of Ḥadīth literature was transmitted by meaning, thereby rendering the Sunnah redundant for legal derivation. In contrast, the second perspective advocates for the strict literal transmission of Ḥadīth, viewing "non-verbatim narration" as an exception, permissible only for minor word changes. Utilizing analytical, critical, and comparative methodologies, this study examines these viewpoints through rigorous textual and doctrinal analysis. By critically assessing the arguments surrounding the potential dismissal of the Sunnah based on "non-verbatim" the article seeks to elucidate the role of Ḥadīth as a primary source of Islamic law, particularly in its relationship to the Quran and legal rulings.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
It is a condition of publication in this journal that authors assign copyright or license publication rights of their articles to the Islamic Research Institute, International Islamic University, Islamabad. This enables IRI to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the article, and of course the journal, to the widest possible readership in print and electronic formats as appropriate. Furthermore, the authors are required to secure permission if they want to reproduce any figure, table, or extract from the text of another source. This applies to direct reproduction as well as "derivative reproduction" (where you have created a new figure or table which derives substantially from a copyrighted source).
