The Development of Scientific Creativity Test for Grade Twelve Chemistry Students
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a creativity test for the science grade 12th chemistry students. The test includes five factors, i.e. Sensitivity to problem, fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration & redefinition. The developed test administered to grade 12 students in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan (n=80). The reliability coefficient of this test was estimated at 0.87 by passing through the test-retest method. To calculate the test reliability the same developed test was administered twice to the same group within a proper interval of time. The recorded scores were correlated through SPSS-17. The coefficient value (r-0.87) provided measure of stability. Rubrics are the standardized marking scheme for assessing student outcomes and performances of the assigned task. Therefore, rubrics were used for scoring of items. The entire procedure seized 25 days. The creativity test was also checked by experts. The experts were those who had command over scientific creativity. The analysis was accomplished to substantiate and check on item discrimination, internal consistency, and agreement between scores. The analysis of the data showed adequate reliability and validity.
Keywords: Creativity, Scientific Creativity Tests (SCT), Rubrics
References
Besemer, S. P., & O’Quinn, K. (1987), Creative product analysis: Testing a model by Developing adjudging instrument. In S. G. Isakson (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp.367-389). Buffalo, NY: Bearly.
Courville, T. G. (2004). An Empirical Comparison of Item Response Theory and Classical Test Theory Item/Person Statistics (Unpublished PhD thesis). Texas A&M University.
Gardner, H. (1993), Collins, creativity Minds; An Anatomy of creativity seen through the Lives of Freud Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot and Graham.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293.
Hany, E. A. (1994). The development of basic cognitive components of technical creativity; A Longitudinal comparison of children and youth with high and average intelligence. In. R. F. Subtonic & K.D Arnold (Eds), Beyond Terman; Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talented (pp.115-154). Nor ward MA: Ablex.
Liang, J. (2002). Exploring scientific creativity of eleventh grade students in Taiwan (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) University of Texas at Austin, Texas.
Muhammad. A. (2006), Investigating the scientific creativity of fifth-grade students (Unpublished Doctoral thesis). The University of Arizona.
Majumdar, S. K. (1975). A systems approach to identification and nurture of scientific creativity. Journal of Indian Education, 1, 17-23.
Robert. E. F, (1982), Human motivation. University of California: Books, Cle publishing company.
Sansanwal, D. N., & Sharma, D. (1993). Scientific creativity as a function of Intelligence, Self-confidence, sex and standard, Indian Journal of Psychometry and Education, 24(1), 37-44.
Sinha, A. K., & Singh, C. (1987), Measurement of scientific creativity, Indian Journal of Psychometry & Education, 18(1), 1-13.
Taylor, A. (1975). An emerging view of creative actions. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity, (pp. 297-325). Chicago: Aldine.
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Stenberg (Ed), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (pp. 43‐75). New‐York: Cambridge University Press.
Philips, R. (2008). A study of the relationship between Intelligence, Scientific Creativity, Achievement Motivation, Home Environment and Achievement in Science of higher secondary school pupils of Kerala (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). School of pedagogical Science, Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam, Kerala.
William M. B. (2017). An Investigation of the Factor Structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational Sciences: Theory & practice, 17(2), 515–528.
Xinfa, Y. (2008). Creativity, efficiency and their organizational, cultural influence (Unpublished Ph.D thesis). Freien University, Germany.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Learning (IJITL)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
IJITL by Department of Education, IIUI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.iiu.edu.pk. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at Licensing and Copyright. All articles published by IJITL are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited as specified by the Creative Commons Attribution License.The journal allows readers to freely read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and to use them for any other lawful purpose. Once published the copyrights are retained with the Journal.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
