Integration of Technology in Teaching of Science at Secondary Level in City Muzaffarabad
Abstract
It is becoming challenging to prepare learners for technological age and use of technology tools in schools. Teachers are integrating technology in schools for instructional purposes. Integrating technology in many content areas is supporting learning, educational environment and enhancing skills of students. Integration of technology is not merely a synonym of computers. The present study is about the integration of technology in teaching of science. The objectives of the study were to explore the current status of instructional technology tools and resources in classroom at secondary level, to identify the effect on learning attitudes of students and to examine the importance of instructional technology for science teachers. This study focused on the current status of the use of technology in the classrooms and about the use of appropriate teaching skills.100 participants were the sample size of the study. In this study two questionnaires were administered to collect data on availability of technology tools and resources in secondary schools along with exploring the status of integrating technology in teaching science at secondary level in city Muzaffarabad. Data analysis revealed that most of the technology resources and tools are available in secondary school of city Muzaffarabad and secondary school teachers are using them in teaching of science. Integration of the technology while teaching learning process benefits the science teachers in the following ways: eases the pressure on them while teaching, professional development, and classroom management and in enhancing their pedagogical skills. Other dimension of this study can be used to measure the students’ performance and their attitude towards learning while integrating technology in teaching science.References
Bayrak, K. B., Erkoç, F. M., & Gül, O.M., (2018) Integration application in interdisciplinary teaching: case of science and technology areas. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED500185.pdf
Becker, H. J., Ravitz, J. L., & Wong, Y. (1999).Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers and software .Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations (CRITO), University of California, Irvine.
Cassidy, M.F. (1982).Towards integration: Education instructional technology and semiotics. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 20(2), 75-89.
Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering the research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459.
Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Education Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.
Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., Campuzano, L., Means, B., Murphy, R., Penuel, W., Javitz, H., Emery, D., & Sussex, W. (2007). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
Flick, L., & Bell, R. (2000). Preparing tomorrow’s Science Teachers Educators. CITE Journal. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. 1(1), 39-60.
Galbraith, J.K. (1967). The new industrial state .Boston: MA Houghton Mifflin.
Hadley, M., & Sheingold, K. (1993). Commonalities and distinctive patterns in teachers' integration of computers. American Journal of Education, 101(5), 261-315.
Honey, M., & Ve, R. B., (1996). Teacher's Beliefs and Technology Integration: Different Values, Different Under-standings. Center for Technology in Education, New York.
Hughes, J., Kerr, S., & Ooms, A. (2005). Content-focused technology inquiry groups: Cases of teacher learning and technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(5) 367-378.
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E (2000). Instructional, curricular and technological supports for inquiry in science classroom. In J. Minstrell & E. H. Van Zee (Eds), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp.283-315), Washington, D.C: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Lederman, N. G. (2000). Technocracizing Science Teaching and Learning: A Response to Flick and Bell. Retrieved form https://www.citejournal.org/volume-1/issue-1-00/science/technocracizing-science-teaching-andlearning-a-response-to-flick-and-bell/
Means, B. J., Blando, K., Oslon, T., Middle, C., Morocco, A., Remz, J. Z. (1993). Using Technology to Support Education Reform U.S Department of Education, Washington D.C. Retrieved form www.ed .gov/pubs/EdReformStudies/TechReforms.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E., &, Kalman, H. (2010).Designing effective instruction: Applications of instructional design (6th Ed.), New York, NY: Wiley.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Teacher use of computers and the Internet in public schools .Washington, D. C.: US Department of Education.
National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4962.
Roblyer, M. D., & Jack, E. (2000).Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. (2nd Ed.). Merrill, an imprint of Prentice Hall.
Wallace, R. M. (2011). Using the Internet to Improve Student Learning and Achievement (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Northern Michigan University, USA.
All articles published in IJITL are open-access articles published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License which allows reproduction, distribution, derives and non-commercial use, provided the original work is cited and authors and publisher are properly identified.
IJITL allows the authors to retain copyright under the CC BY NC license.
