Teaching of Science at Secondary Level: An Analysis of Teachers’ Classroom Practices

  • Muhammad Naqeeb-ul-Khalil Shaheen District Training & Support Center
  • Muhammad Munir Kayani International Islamic University Islamabad
  • Nazir Haider Shah Mohi-ud-Din Islamic University, Nerian Sharif, AJK

Abstract

The attempt is done to analyze the science teachers’ classroom practices at Secondary level in Rawalpindi-a district of the Punjab (Pakistan). The objectives of the study were to analyze and compare pedagogical practices of teachers with respect to their gender, qualification and experience. Six null hypotheses were developed. A cross-sectional survey was conducted for the study. Random sampling technique was used for the selection of male (120) and female (120) teachers. The questionnaire was used for the science teachers to analyze their classroom practices. Data was collected by visiting the sample secondary schools of the District Rawalpindi personally. Data of questionnaire was analyzed by using an independent sample t-test and two-way ANOVA. It was found that there were significant differences between classroom practices with respect to their gender and qualification; moreover, there were interaction effects of teachers' qualification and gender; gender and experience and qualification and experience on their practices in the classrooms. It was recommended to train and encourage male and female teachers equally.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Naqeeb-ul-Khalil Shaheen, District Training & Support Center
Teacher Educator  (Monitoring  and  Evaluation)
Muhammad Munir Kayani, International Islamic University Islamabad
Assistant Professor, Department of Education
Nazir Haider Shah, Mohi-ud-Din Islamic University, Nerian Sharif, AJK

Lecturer, Department of Education 

References

Anjum, A. (2002). Problem faced by Secondary School Teachers at Kamra Cant. (Thesis: Master in Education) Islamabad: International Islamic University.

Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M. &. Tsai, Y.M. (2009). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge: Cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, pp. 133-180.

Brownlee, J., Boulton-Lewis, G., & Purdie, N. (2002). Core beliefs about knowing and peripheral beliefs about learning: Developing an holistic conceptualization of epistemological beliefs. Australian Journal of Educational and Development Psychology, 2, 1-16.

Cooper, T. (2002). Why students retention fails to assure quality. Paper presented at the HERDSA Conference, Edith Cowan University, WA.

Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937.

Creemers, B. P. M. & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The Dynamics of Educational Effectiveness: A Contribution to Policy. Practice and Theory in Contemporary Schools. London/New York: Routledge.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand, and standards: How we can ensure a competent, caring, and qualified teacher for every child. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's future.

Faize, F. A. & Dahar, M. A. (2011). Effect of Mother’s Level of Education on Secondary Grade Science Students in Pakistan. Research Journal of International Studies, 19, 13-19.

Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Researcher, 38, 47-65

Feldman, A. (2000). Decision making in the practical domain: A model of practical conceptual change. Science Education, 84(5), 606-623.

Johnson, K. (2004). The role of field paleontology on teachers' attitudes toward inquiry science. NOVAtions Journal, 2004(2f). Retrieved 12/10/2015 from http://novationsjournal.org/content/article.pl?sid=04/05/04/0024254&mode=thread &t...

Keys, P. M. (2005). Are teachers walking the walk or just talking the talk in science education? Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 11(5), 499-516.

Klieme, E., Pauli, C. & Reusser, K. (2009). Quality of geometry instruction and its short- term impact on students’ understanding of the Pythagorean Theorem. Learning and Instruction, 19, 527-537.

Mundhe, K. L. & Herkal, S. C. (2013). Life Long Learning: Progression from pedagogy to Andragogy then to Heutagogy. Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies (SRJIS).

National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching (NCMST, 2000). Before it's too late. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Centre, U.S Department of Education.

National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

National Research Council (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Orr, B. (1999). Pre-service Teachers Perceived Success of Classroom Management Strategies. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 17(1).

Reeves, T. (2002). Mass education and quality. Paper presented at the HERDSA Conference: Keynote address: Edith Cowan University, Perth.

Shaheen, F. (2003). A Study of the Problems of the Overcrowded Schools at Secondary Level in District Attock. (Thesis: Master in Education), Department of Education, Islamabad: International Islamic University.

Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D. & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 105-122.

Vant Hooft, M. (2005). The effect of the "Ohio school going solar" project on student perceptions of the quality of learning in middle school science. Journal of Research in Technology Education, 37(3), 221-244.

Published
2019-01-02