EFFECT OF USING TANGRAM PUZZLES ON THE ACHIEVEMENT OF STUDENTS IN GEOMETRY AT PRIMARY LEVEL

  • Tabassum Saleem International Islamic University Islamabad
  • Shamsa Aziz International Islamic University Islamabad

Abstract

Geometry is basically concerned with conversion of graphics in space. The spatial abilities of the students can be enhanced through geometrical teaching. In geometry, the teaching and learning process can be made interesting by using puzzles games. The present study was conducted to study the effect of tangram puzzles on students’ achievement in geometry at primary level. The study was experimental in nature. The experiment was conducted in a private school of urban area of district Rawalpindi. There were total 46 students in grade four. These were divided into two groups (controlled group, experimental group). Duration of the experiment was three weeks. Cognitive domain of Bloom Taxonomy was selected to evaluate the students’ achievement. Four levels of cognitive domain were selected which were Knowledge, Comprehension, Application and Analysis. For the analysis of data independent sample t-test was used. Significant difference in the achievement of students of both the group (controlled and experimental) was observed at Knowledge, Application, Analysis level of Bloom Taxonomy. While no significant difference in students’ achievement was observed at Comprehension level. It was concluded that tangram puzzles are helpful teaching aids. It is being recommended that these puzzles should be added in teachers’ training programs. 

Author Biographies

Tabassum Saleem, International Islamic University Islamabad
MS Education Scholar, Department of Education
Shamsa Aziz, International Islamic University Islamabad
Associate Professor/Chairperson, Department of Education

References

Adolphus, T. ( 2011). Problems of Teaching and Learning of Geometry in Secondary Schools in Rivers State, Nigeria. International Journal of Emerging. Sciences, 1(2), 143-152.

Averbach, B. (1981). Problem Solving through recreational mathematics.physics Today.

Badger, T. M., & Medina, E. V. (2015). Puzzles-based Learning of Mathematics in Engineering. Engineering Education, 8(1), 122-134.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Lonmans Green and Company.

Bohning, G. & Althouse, J. K. (1997). Using Tangram to teach geometry to young Children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 24(4), 239-242.

CDG. (2010). Rawalpindi District Educational Plan. Rawalpindi: International Labour Organization.

Chen, Y. (2010). Effect of Gender Difference and Spatial abilities within a digital pentominoes game. Computer in Education, 55(2), 1220-1233.

Davis, B. (1995). The Role of Games in Mathematics. Square One, 7-17.

Elffers, J. (1976). Tangram, the Ancient Chinese shapes game. Penguin Books.

Hanson, K. (2012). Tangram Across the Curriculum. Dover Adult Learning Center.Drexel University.

Koman, F. K. (1986). Some problems concerning teaching geometry to pupils aged 10 to 14 Studies in mathematics education Teaching of geometry. VendGm, France:Imprimerie des Presses Universitaires de France.

Krongthong, & Khairiree. (2015). Creative Thinking in Mathematics with Tangrams and The Geometer Sketchpad. Proceedings of the 20th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics, (pp. 153-161). Leshan.

Kubota, C. (1976). Tangram: An Ancient chinese Puzzle. A Conceptual Skill Development Kit for All Grade levels. SPI Project, Washington Office of the State Superinterdent of Public Instruction, Olmpia.

Lee, C.W., Huang, J.K., Chou, W.S., Sun, H.H., Yeh, T.Y., Huang, M.J. & Chen, H.C. (2008). Development of a Geometry Learning Game with Tangible User Interfaces. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1548-1553). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Medhat, R. H., Siddo, R., & Issa, M. (2011). Tangram-base Problem Solving in Radical Constructivist Paradigm: High School Student-Teacher Conjecture. retrieved from directorymathsed.net/download/Rahim.pdf

Piaget, B. I. (1967). A Child’s Conception of Space. New York: Routledge.

PinLine, C., Shao, Y., & Hsiang, L. (2011). The Impact of using synchironous collborative virtual tangram in childrens' geometric. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 132-140.

Pesen, C. (2003). Egitim fakulteleri ve sinif ogretmenleri icin matematik ogretimi ( Mathematics teaching for education faculties and primary school teachers). Ankara, Turkey: Nobel publications.

Read, R. C. (1965). Tangram : 330 puzzles. New York: Dover Publications. USA.

Russell, D., & Bologna, E. (1982). Teaching Geometry with Tangram. Arithmetic Teacher, 30(2), 34-38.

Siew, N. M. (2013). Learning Geometry in a Large- Enrollment Class: Do Tangram Help in Developing Students' Geometric Thinking. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Sciences, 2(3), 239-259.

Sinclair, N., & Bruce, C. D. (2015). New Opportunities in Geometry Education at Primary School. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(3) , 319-329.

Slocum, J. (2003). Tangram: The world's First Puzzle Craze. Sterling.

Song, Z. (2002). Designing Games-Based Interactive Mathematics Learning Environment for Children. The University Of British Columbia.retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9b45/ea6c5a7dde01835451d05e6bea6cd04d786e.pdf

Webster , M. (2017, march 14). merriam webster. Retrieved from www.merriam-webster.com: https:www.merriam-webester.com/dictionary/geometry

Xiaoxi, T. (2012). The Art and Mathematics of Tangram. Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture Culture, retrieved from http://achive.bridgesmathart.org/2012/ bridges2012-553.html.

.

Published
2019-01-02