WHY DISTANCE LEARNING PROGRAMS FAIL TO BRING QUALITY: A CASE STUDY OF AN ONLINE DISTANCE LEARNING PROGRAM IN PAKISTAN
Abstract
The paper identifies the reasons of ineffective implementation of distance learning programs in Pakistan. The distance learning programs are not new in Pakistan, but the induction of technology in these programs made them very different from the traditional distance learning program. On one hand, the use of technology created a huge attraction for people to enroll in these programs. On the other hand, the mode of delivery causes several problems. These problems are of unique nature, and administration is unable to address these due to lack of training and full understanding of the system. The current problems need innovative solutions. The qualitative research method was applied to find the multiple reasons that are responsible for the ineffective deployment of the system, and low learning experiences of students. The participants include the key stake holders such as faculty, administrators, Study Centre coordinators, students and staff. The paper highlighted three major areas; a) Poor policy at administrative level, b) Ineffective communication among stakeholders, and c) Low Learning experiences of students. The researcher's finding includes the in-depth analysis of the ineffective areas in the system. The finding and analysis indicates that the inconsistent policies at top leadership level, followed by the middle and lower administration. The major policy concerns are related to inconsistency, lack of consultancy with stake holders, untrained administrative staff, and poorly developed marketing campaign. The study also found that there is a lack of communication among stakeholders, especially between administration and the study centre coordinators. Due to lack of communication and poor coordination, the system is unable to produce desirable results. Lastly, the student's learning experience is at the lowest level due to lack of understanding of the distance learning mode of teaching. The paper concludes with the strong recommendations and suggestions come from the major stake holders to improve the system. These suggestions and recommendations include the seriousness in leadership to develop better policies with reasonable consistency, identify ways to reduce communication gap between different stakeholders. Lastly, the researcher argues to make academic reforms to provide better learning experiences to the students.References
Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). An e-Learning Theoretical Framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 292-307. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.vlib.interchange.at/stable/jeductechsoci.19.1.292
Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2014). Trends in the e-learning ecosystem: A Bibliometric study. In Proceedings of 20th American Conference on Information System. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2014/Posters/ISEducation/7
Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance Education Trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139–153.
Chizmar, J.F., &Walbert, M.S. (1999). Web-based learning environments guided by principles of good teaching practice. Journal of Economic Education, 248–264.
Eisinger, J. (2000). Education Ev olution. Journal of Association Management, 52(13), 52– 59.
Greene, S., Harris, E. (2011). Qualitative research methodology: “A review of the current literature and its application to the qualitative component of growing up in Ireland”. Mespil Road, Dublin: DúnAimhirgin.
Hannafin, M.J., Hill, J.R., Oliver, K., Glazer, E., & Sharma, P. (2003). Cognitive and learning factors in Web-based distancelearning environments. In M.G. Moore, & W.G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education ( pp. 245–260). Mahwah,NJ: Erlbaum.
Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2001). Student distress in Web-based distance education. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 3.
Hill, J.R. (2002). Overcoming obstacles and creating connections: Community building in Web-based learning environments.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(1), 67–86.
Hofmann, D.W. (2002). Internet-based distance learning in higher education. Tech Directions, 62(1), 28–32.
Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Newland, B., & Byles, L. (2014). Changing academic teaching with Web 2.0 technologies. Innovations in Educations and TeachingInternational, 51(3), 315–325.
Petrides, L.A. (2002). Web-based technologies for distributed (or distance) learning: Creating learning-centered educationalexperiences in the higher education classroom. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1), 69–77.
Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an onlinecourse: A case study. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 77–90.
Yang, S. C., & Tung, C.-J. (2007). Comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school. Computers in Human Behavior,23(1), 79–96.
© By Department of Education (Directorate of Distance Education) International Islamic University Islamabad. IJDEEL by International Islamic University Islamabad is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.iiu.edu.pk. All articles published by IJDEEL are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial 4.0 International License . This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited as specified by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
