QUALITY OF RESEARCH IN DISTANCE EDUCATION: AN ANALYSIS OF ATTITUDE AND FACILITIES PROVIDED AT HIGHER
Abstract
Research was based on five objectives. The major purpose of the research was to assess the impact of student’s attitude and facilities on quality of research in distance education system. Further the research was focused on comparison of student’s attitude, provision of facilities and quality of research in public and private sector distance education institutions. The research was based on descriptive- co relational style. All the higher level distance education institutions of Islamabad were considered as the population of the research. The researcher used the disproportionate stratified sampling technique to draw the sample for the study. 66 teachers contributed in the data collection process among which 30 were from public and 36 were from private sector. The study was delimited to the two distance education universities of Islamabad for the ease of the researcher. The researcher used a self developed questionnaire for the purpose of data collection. The tool was based on three major parts that were attitude assessment, facilities provision assessment and research quality assessment. The data revealed that attitude of the students was having 8.5% (p <0.01) effect on the quality of research while the provision of the facilities was having 39% (p <0.01) effect on the quality of research. However there was no statistically significant difference found between public and private sector universities with reference to the attitude of students, provision of facilities and quality of research. Thus it was recommended that the latest electronic facilities related to the media access through internet and web integration may be provided to the students in order to get maximum benefit. There is also a need to develop a serious attitude of the students towards the research activities. The research findings may also be applied in the practical situation to encourage the real creativity of the researcher.
References
Berge, Z., & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3). 5-19.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami. P. C., Lou. Y., & Borokhovski, E. (2004). A methodological morass? How we can improve quantitative research in distance education. Distance Education, 25(2), 175-198.
Calvert, J. (1995). Mapping knowledge in distance education. In D. Sewart (Ed.), One World. Many Voices: Quality in Open and Distance learning - 17th World Conference Proceedings (pp. 384-388). Milton Keynes: ICDE.
Charlton, J. R. H. (2004). Delphi technique. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Jegede, O. J. (1994). Distance education research priorities for Australia: A study of the opinions of distance educators and practitioners. Distance Education, 15(2), 234-253.
Koble, M. A., & Bunker, E. L. (1997). Trends in research and practice: An examination of The American Journal of Distance Education, 1987-1995. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(2), 19-38.
Lee, Y., Driscoll, M. P., & Nelson, D. W. (2004). The past, present, and future of research in distance education: Results of a content analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 225-241.
McGreal, R. (2004). Stealing the goose: Copyright and learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(3).
Minnes, J. R. (1985). Ethnography, case study, grounded theory, and distance education research. Distance Education, 6(2), 189-198.
Mishra. S. (1997). A critical analysis of periodical literature in distance education. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 6(1&2), 39-54.
Neumann, W. L. (2007). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Pearson.
Oluka OC, Nie S, Sun Y. (2014). Quality Assessment of TPB-Based Questionnaires: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 9(4): e94419. doi:10.1371/journal.
Osiakwan, C., & Wright, D. (2001). Distance training for operating equipment: A cost-benefit and return-on-investment analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 69-79.
Panda, S. (1992). Distance educational research in India: Stock-taking, concerns and prospects.Distance Education, 13(2), 309-326.
Perraton, H. (2000). Rethinking the research agenda. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1).
Rourke, L., & Szabo, M. (2002). A content analysis of the Journal of Distance Education 1986-2001.Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 63-74.
Saba, F. (2000). Research in distance education: A status report. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1).
Zawacki-Richter, O. (2009). Research areas in distance education: A Delphi study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3).
© By Department of Education (Directorate of Distance Education) International Islamic University Islamabad. IJDEEL by International Islamic University Islamabad is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.iiu.edu.pk. All articles published by IJDEEL are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial 4.0 International License . This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited as specified by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
